Home » Brian and the Judge

WSJ: Clash Looms on Banks

5 November 2009 No Comment Download My Toolbar!

Choosing between Cong. Barney Frank’s let-the-Federal-Reserve regulate all banks legislation and Sen. Chris Dodd’s let’s-establish-a-new-regulator legislation is really a pick-your-poison choice. Both proposals presume that the free market should not be free, both presume that bureaucrats and politicians should supersede the free choices of consumers and investors, and neither proposal finds any basis in the Constitution. The Frank proposal puts most regulatory power into the hands of the super-secretive Fed, whose ways are essentially unknown and unknowable, while the Dodd proposal puts all regulatory power into the hands of a new bureaucracy. The Dodd proposal (a copy of which has not yet been released) purports to strip the Federal Reserve of some regulatory authority that it already has. If this were to pass, it would be the first time since 1913, when the Monster from Jekyll Island was born, that the government has actually taken power away from it.



This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. © 2009 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY